Rutgers Journal of
Law & Public Policy
SEARCH JLPP ABOUT US MASTHEAD CONTACT US
Volume 3 Issue 2
Volume 3, Issue 2: Urban Privacy Rights

complete issue - PDF


The globalization of the economy in recent years has created the need for the transfer of vast quantities of personal data across international borders. Such transfers are often governed by "data protection" laws designed to protect the privacy of information acquired relating to individual employees and consumers. ... [read more]

Blakley explores the historical evolution of privacy concepts and then, using Ludwig Wittgenstein's "family resemblance theory" (examined beyond its application to privacy thought by David Solove) in coordination with ordinary language methodology, attempts to define the core family resemblance as "control of disclosure of self." ... [read more]

This article examines European data protection legislation and provides an overview on European digital privacy rights. It notes that, although the European Union has recognized the need for greater protection of personal data, rapidly changing standards and technologies constantly present new and innovative threats to digital privacy. ... [read more]

Much of the attention to contemporary privacy invading technologies focuses on the actions of governments and large organizations. Yet the actions of big brother and big corporation must be seen alongside of those of little sister and brother, not to mention mom, dad, friends and strangers.... [read more]

In jury selection, there exists a tension between a litigant's desire to obtain every possible nugget of information regarding prospective jurors, and those jurors' desires to keep personal information private. The Supreme Court has not definitively answered the question of whether jurors have a constitutional right to privacy that protects them from overly intrusive voir dire questions, although the court has recognized a privacy "interest."... [read more]

This article establishes a connection between personhood through property interests while intersecting search and seizure precedent into a property-based explication. Social and financial capital corresponds to the level of what, in theory, is an innate and unanimous right provided by the Constitution: protection from illegal searches and seizures. ... [read more]


Copyright Permission Membership Selection

© Rutgers Journal of Law and Public Policy
Web ISSN: 1934-3744
Print ISSN: 1934-3736
Rutgers University School of Law - Camden
217 North Fifth Street, Camden NJ 08102
Note: This journal was known as the Journal of Law and Urban Policy prior to April 2006.